Summary: Kepler graphics engine comes to the mid-range market, competes against AMD Radeon 7950.
While all the attention is compensated to the excessive great end when it comes to design cards -- and which is the quickest greeting credit card ever -- not as many players are willing to pay $500 or more for those forums. So it may not be as interesting when the new high-end technology outflow down to the mid variety -- that is, unless you're in the marketplace for one of those cards.
A very good example is the new Nvidia GeForce GTX 660 Ti, which is designed using the same GK104 GPU (a.k.a Kepler) that abilities the high -- and expensive -- GeForce GTX 680, but will cost around $299 instead of $499. Obviously, you won't get the same performance, but if you're improving from an older greeting credit card, the benefits will be easily obvious. You will get 1,344 CUDA cores, 2GB of video storage, a 192-bit storage bus, and a platform time rate of 915MHz. Those specifications are for any referrals greeting credit card, though personalized and overclocked cards from Nvidia's production associates are available.
So how does the GTX 660 Ti's performance evaluate to the AMD Radeon HD 7870 and Radeon HD 7950, two competitive cards that bookend the new Nvidia panel in pricing? As is more the situation these days, results are combined from analyze to analyze and writer to writer (see Anandtech, HotHardware, and Tom's Hardware) -- there's no slam-dunk choose among these mid-range cards. AMD has made things even tougher by stating that it would be offering a BIOS upgrade to the Radeon HD 7950 that will provide its Increase software overclocking resource, no question trying to back up the strike from the GTX 660 Ti release.
Gaming PC creators have been quick to declare support for the new Nvidia greeting credit card, with everyone from CyberPower to Maingear to Speed Small now such as the GTX 660 Ti as an option for their game playing personal computers. Are you in the marketplace for the new greeting credit card, or would you like one of AMD's mid-range offerings?
A very good example is the new Nvidia GeForce GTX 660 Ti, which is designed using the same GK104 GPU (a.k.a Kepler) that abilities the high -- and expensive -- GeForce GTX 680, but will cost around $299 instead of $499. Obviously, you won't get the same performance, but if you're improving from an older greeting credit card, the benefits will be easily obvious. You will get 1,344 CUDA cores, 2GB of video storage, a 192-bit storage bus, and a platform time rate of 915MHz. Those specifications are for any referrals greeting credit card, though personalized and overclocked cards from Nvidia's production associates are available.
So how does the GTX 660 Ti's performance evaluate to the AMD Radeon HD 7870 and Radeon HD 7950, two competitive cards that bookend the new Nvidia panel in pricing? As is more the situation these days, results are combined from analyze to analyze and writer to writer (see Anandtech, HotHardware, and Tom's Hardware) -- there's no slam-dunk choose among these mid-range cards. AMD has made things even tougher by stating that it would be offering a BIOS upgrade to the Radeon HD 7950 that will provide its Increase software overclocking resource, no question trying to back up the strike from the GTX 660 Ti release.
Gaming PC creators have been quick to declare support for the new Nvidia greeting credit card, with everyone from CyberPower to Maingear to Speed Small now such as the GTX 660 Ti as an option for their game playing personal computers. Are you in the marketplace for the new greeting credit card, or would you like one of AMD's mid-range offerings?
