Summary: A document prepared by Samsung engineers that compares features of the iPhone with the Galaxy S has been admitted into evidence in the ongoing Apple versus Samsung trial in the US.
However, a interpretation of a review ready by the Southern Japanese organization truly that straight blogs about the iPhone to the Universe S — termed as the 'S1' — has been confessed into proof in the situation currently being observed in the US region judge of north Florida. Apple organization has already stated in the situation New Samsung "slavishly" duplicated components of its style for its mobile phones and pills.
Areas for enhancement :
In the papers, acquired by AllThingsD, New Samsung analyzes thousands of factors between the two gadgets, directing out key variations and places for enhancement in its own product along the way. In determining the disadvantages of the Universe S1, the organization's technical engineers also suggested ways in which it and UI could be modified.
Section 5, for example, analyzes components of the desltop on the gadgets, observing that the iPhone does not allow the putting of copy symbols on the desltop but that the S1 "causes individual misunderstandings because several symbols for the same selection option can be placed on the property screen".
The observe at underneath of the fall indicates that the show needs to be customized so that replications cannot be placed on the desltop.
The papers also contains an overall conclusion evaluation of features of the iPhone and S1 side-by-side.
Patent infringement?
While the 132-page papers is unlikely to help Samsung's protection group, Apple organization will still have to confirm that the organization infringed on particular patents or particular components of style of the iPhone — a decision that will eventually be taken by a 10-person judge.
In the UK, the certain argument between the organizations led to a judgment that Samsung's Universe product styles do not infringe on Apple's iPad. As a result Apple organization has been requested to show a observe on its website declaring that New Samsung did not infringe upon its product styles.
The continuous legal argument between Apple organization and New Samsung has taken an exciting perspective as a papers that straight blogs about the iPhone with the Universe 'S1' has been confessed into proof.
The two smart phone producers have been involved in lawsuits over stated trademark and certain infringements in a number of nations around the world, with both organizations reviewing triumphs and beats in different areas.
The two smart phone producers have been involved in lawsuits over stated trademark and certain infringements in a number of nations around the world, with both organizations reviewing triumphs and beats in different areas.
However, a interpretation of a review ready by the Southern Japanese organization truly that straight blogs about the iPhone to the Universe S — termed as the 'S1' — has been confessed into proof in the situation currently being observed in the US region judge of north Florida. Apple organization has already stated in the situation New Samsung "slavishly" duplicated components of its style for its mobile phones and pills.
Areas for enhancement :
In the papers, acquired by AllThingsD, New Samsung analyzes thousands of factors between the two gadgets, directing out key variations and places for enhancement in its own product along the way. In determining the disadvantages of the Universe S1, the organization's technical engineers also suggested ways in which it and UI could be modified.
Section 5, for example, analyzes components of the desltop on the gadgets, observing that the iPhone does not allow the putting of copy symbols on the desltop but that the S1 "causes individual misunderstandings because several symbols for the same selection option can be placed on the property screen".
The observe at underneath of the fall indicates that the show needs to be customized so that replications cannot be placed on the desltop.
The papers also contains an overall conclusion evaluation of features of the iPhone and S1 side-by-side.
Patent infringement?
While the 132-page papers is unlikely to help Samsung's protection group, Apple organization will still have to confirm that the organization infringed on particular patents or particular components of style of the iPhone — a decision that will eventually be taken by a 10-person judge.
In the UK, the certain argument between the organizations led to a judgment that Samsung's Universe product styles do not infringe on Apple's iPad. As a result Apple organization has been requested to show a observe on its website declaring that New Samsung did not infringe upon its product styles.
